The Deluge Overwhelmed Our Rain Gauge

Manual rain gauge with 11″ capacity

We’ve received 3.11″ of rain at our location just north of the Vet’s Home since midnight. That’s an all-time record for our station.

Unfortunately, our automated rain gauge had some issues overnight and missed 1 full inch of rain. Yikes! Normally, it is pretty accurate. For the last two big rainfalls (on 9/1 and 8/27) it read within a few percent of our reference gauge. I’ve now inspected the tipping bucket, cleaned it out (the cups were pretty dirty), and returned it to service. I’ll keep an eye on it.

For today (9/5), I’ve overridden the automatic gauge with the manual measurement. You’ll see the wrong value in the stats graph at the top of the stats page. The precipitation tables further down the page should be correct, though.

How big was that rain event? It looks like Marquette set a new daily rainfall record for September 5th for the 24 hours ending at 7AM this morning. The official COOP station at the Water Treatment Plant on Lakeshore Dr. reported 3.41″ during that time. The old record was 1.3″ set in 2007. By comparison, for the 24 hours ending at 8AM this morning, we measured 3.29″.

Marquette has seen even greater rainfall in its history. On September 29, 1881, 4.44″ fell!

Altogether since August 27th, we’ve recorded 7.51″ of rain! I don’t know if that’s a record stretch for the city, but it sure knocks my socks off!

We took a small amount of water into our basement. Nothing serious, though. Apparently, we aren’t alone as there are reports around town of basement flooding. Let us know in the comments if you’ve been affected by all this rain we’ve had.

Adjusted Humidity Readings

We are now adding 5% when humidity readings reach 95% since that is the maximum our sensor will read. For many years Davis Instruments’ sensors have struggled to achieve 100% humidity. Unfortunately, the problem seems to worsen with time. When we placed our sensor in service last November 28th, it would reach 98%.

Also, we are adding 1% to 92% (to make 93%) , 2% to 93% (to make 95%), and 4% to 94% to reduce the jump between 91% and 100%. Tests demonstrate these adjustments closely approximate reality.

You may occasionally see other readings besides 93%, 95%, 98%, and 100% due to 5 minute averaging of humidity values.

Raw values are available on the stats page.

Here’s some more info on this problem if you’re interested:

We have a backup weather station for emergencies. It also contains a Davis VP2 station with an SHT31 sensor inside that is less than 2 years old. It maxes out at 96% humidity, but it also has an average +8% bias below 80% which worsens as temperatures climb into the 80s and 90s. So it has a wet bias in the middle and a dry bias at the top. Keep in mind that the maximum error for this sensor is supposed to be 3.5% according to the manufacturer.

We are not the only ones to experience these issues. Many other Davis VP2 weather station owners have reported them (in a thread approaching 1200 posts). Davis says they are “looking into it”, although that was almost 2 months ago now. Some particularly brave souls have attempted to informally wire up older and/or unsupported sensors (SHT75) with varying degrees of luck. We’re not keen on performing ad hoc experiments with our primary temperature/humidity sensor. Some combination of Murphy’s Law and common sense would argue that such slapdash “solutions” will inevitably break at the worst time. Indeed our various attempts with other sensors on the test bench have not gone well. Therefore, we await a viable, proven fix preferably from Davis Instruments.

When Weather Apps Fail at Weather

I wrote about this yesterday on Twitter. Given the limitations of that platform, however, I couldn’t really go deep. Let’s dive in.

Here are two screenshots taken within 60 seconds yesterday afternoon:


The 1st image is of a popular weather app recently redesigned for the iPhone. The 2nd image is our universal web app loaded in Safari on an iPhone.*

Continue reading “When Weather Apps Fail at Weather”

Temperature Readings Just Improved!

Custom Davis radiation shield

There was a Problem?

So perhaps you’ve noticed lately on sunny days forecasted highs have been lower than the actual highs by several degrees. Well… it turns out that’s not entirely true.

During the deepest part of winter when the polar vortex was regularly occurring (late December into January), we were having equipment issues. Normally, we measure temperatures inside an enclosure that has a fan running on solar power during the day and batteries at night. Unfortunately, the weather destroyed the electronics that controlled the battery charging, among other casualties.

As a quick fix, we installed a passive (fan-less) shield for our sensor. Passive shelters are fine during our normally very cloudy, windy winters. Wouldn’t you know it, the sun decided to show up and, along with it, gentle breezes! That makes for beautiful winter days in Marquette. It is also a recipe for solar-induced sensor errors.

The snow acts like a mirror to the sun and the reflected radiation gets into the sensor and heats it up. How much? A rough estimate, based on before and after tests of running with and without a fan, is 3-5 degrees F. Studies have shown that, in fact, on completely calm, sunny days over a fresh blanket of snow, errors can reach up to 18 deg F! Continue reading “Temperature Readings Just Improved!”